TA的每日心情 | 擦汗 2020-7-15 17:06 |
---|
簽到天數: 6 天 [LV.2]偶爾看看I
|
馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。
您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊
x
【导演】:皮埃尔·保罗·帕索里尼
【主演】: 托托/尼内托·达沃利/费米·贝努西/罗萨纳·迪罗科
【标签】: 喜剧/奇幻
【制片地区/国家】:意大利
【年份】:1966
【语言】:意大利语
【上映时间】: 1966-05-04
【片长】: 89 /USA: 91 /Spain: 84
【原名】:Uccellacci e uccellini
【又名】:The Hawks and the Sparrows/鹰与麻雀
【评分】:豆瓣:7.7 ,IMDB:7.5
【IMDb链接】: tt0061132
在这部大鸟和小鸟喜剧/奇幻片中,在《大鸟和小鸟》中,独特的、童话般的寓言不过是帕索里尼用来思考置身于无产阶级和天主教会之间的小资产阶级地位的手段。但这一思考是很不正统和幽默的。一个老人(托托)和他的儿子在公路上行走,从“思想王国"里来的一个会说话的乌鸦加入他俩的行列。这只乌鸦想向他们解释他们生活中的各种矛盾,并给他们讲了关于神圣的弗朗西斯、他的两个学生、麻雀和 鹰的寓言。显然,那只传授理论的乌鸦是指意大利共 党领袖陶里亚蒂。而神圣的弗朗西斯说的一段话则是教皇(保罗六世)在联合国大会上为积极服务于社会的基督教所作的宣传。最后乌鸦为自己而哭泣,并把自己奉献给这两个流浪者进食。这两个人也真把它吃了。按帕索里尼的说法,他的影片是为了探讨“抵抗运动期间和五十年代马克思主义的危机"。影片并没有引申出抽象的“信息"(除了马克思主义承认新现实外);相反却表现了不同观点的辩证关系。这些观点互相中和,而且没有一个观点能对两个小资产阶级的或者流氓无产者的主人公产生持续的影响。
Joe This richly symbolic film is really impossible to understand without some knowledge of 20th Century Italian history, and particularly the power of the Roman Catholic Church. The Lateran Treaty of 1929 finally politically separated Italy from Church power by creating the Vatican as a sovereign state. But the trade off was the that the Church was still left in power over many aspects of everyday Italian life. For instance, Italy finally established a civilian divorce law through a bitterly contested 1970 referendum. Before then, divorce was under strictly in the domain of Church law, and the Church NEVER granted a divorce, even in extreme cases like when a spouse was abandoned many years hence. Overall, however, the power of the Church still resided in the blind allegiance of Italians at all levels to Church morality. Over decades, this led to impeding Italy's social and political progress, and greatly maintained the status quo in the division between the privileged upper class & the downtrodden masses. The Leftist & Communist movements that began after WWII battled against this status quo, and indirectly against the Church through Progressive agendas. ALL This doesn't even amount to an adequate thumbnail of all the issues that this film touched upon. Pasolini really needed to couch this head-on criticism of contemporary Italian society in a comedy, because I suspect that at some level he would have feared for his life had he delivered a more serious work covering the same controversial topics.
说教的无用。只为那些理想而哭泣。导演说。走向那里?。帕哥的知识分子命题?。电影不能太随心所欲。
|
|