鐵馬威高清綜合論壇

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
查看: 5|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[其他] 1982[甜蜜的家]Home Sweet Home[BT下载/迅雷下载]

[複製鏈接]
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-7-15 17:06
  • 簽到天數: 6 天

    [LV.2]偶爾看看I

    跳轉到指定樓層
    樓主
    發表於 2017-4-18 00:09:41 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式

    馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。

    您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊

    x

                                   
    登錄/註冊後可看大圖

    【导演】:迈克·李
                                【主演】: 埃瑞克·理查德/蒂莫西·斯波/Kay Stonham/弗兰西斯·巴贝
                                【标签】: 剧情/喜剧
                                【制片地区/国家】:英国
                                【年份】:1982
                                【语言】:英语
                                【上映时间】: 1982-03-16(英国)
                                【片长】: 95
                                【原名】:Home Sweet Home
                                【又名】:
                                【评分】:豆瓣:0 ,IMDB:7.5
                                【IMDb链接】: tt0084082
                               
                               
                               
    在这部甜蜜的家剧情/喜剧片中,Another of Mike Leigh's efforts in the Play for Today series. Home Sweet Home is the he tragic-comic tale of a lonely postman, the social workers who chivvy him about his estranged teenage daughter, and his secret affairs with the wives of his fellow postmen.
    "Though the social and economic situations of Leigh's characters are invariably specified, they are not determinative. In his view, institutions don't cause our problems and institutions cannot solve them. Nothing beyond the structure of our own thoughts and emotions can be blamed for our predicament and nothing outside of ourselves can remedy it. The poorest of Leigh's characters could win the lottery, or the richest be forced out onto the streets, without their basic dramatic problems changing.
    One only has to compare Ken Loach's Ladybird, Ladybird with Leigh's Home Sweet Home or his short, Probation, for the difference between the two viewpoints to be clear. Whereas Loach mounts an institutional critique, the social systems and bureaucracies in Leigh's work are only individuals writ large. Home Sweet Home dramatizes the relationship of two social workers, Dave and Melody, to a client, Stan, and his daughter Tina, but for Leigh the social workers are ultimately just messed-up people. One might say that while Loach looks at the effect, Leigh studies the cause. Loach studies bureaucracies; Leigh examines the individual qualities that make bureaucracies the way they are. The main characters in Ladybird, Ladybird are victims of a social agency's depersonalizing understandings. Leigh refuses to make Stan and Tina victims of anybody or anything. Home Sweet Home makes clear that, even if all of the social workers were to disappear from the universe, Stan and Tina's relationship would not improve one whit (and in fact would very likely get worse, since in the absence of a pushy, intrusive, boorish Melody, Tina would get no visits or trips home at all).
    There is an ultimate fairness in Leigh's view of life. We get what we are. Nothing is inflicted on us (just as nothing outside of ourselves can save us). We create our own problems and we ourselves must solve them. It would be hard to imagine a view of experience more at odds with the blame-games played by most cultural studies critics. Leigh's characters can never blame anything or anyone–least of all "the system." External forces (figured by ever fashionable ideological concepts like "power," "gender," and "class") have no ultimate authority over what we are. We are responsible for our own fates. The enemy, if there is an enemy, is inside. Odd as it may sound to say it, the writers on cultural studies and neo-Marxist filmmakers like Loach are actually more optimistic than Leigh, for while the social-work bureaucracy (Loach's target) may conceivably be reformed, the human heart and mind (Leigh's subjects) are all too deplorably (and exultantly) what they are for all eternity. I would argue that the institutional critique is in fact the simpler, more superficial, and more naive way of understanding these situations. The labyrinths of the human heart are far more tortuous and Byzantine than the corridors of power that constitute the welfare system. The bureaucracies of the imagination are far subtler and more insidious than those of any man-made institution. And if you say you don't see that or don't understand how that could possibly be, why that is precisely what a work like Home Sweet Home exists to show...."
    –Excerpted from Ray Carney, "The Films of Mike Leigh: Embracing the World "
                        Three postal workers and their dysfunctional families interact over cups of tea and Sunday dinner. Stan, Gordon, and Harold sort mail. While the clueless Harold's at work, Stan nips round for loveless sex with Harold's near-sighted, romance-starved wife, June. When Gordon's out, Hazel invites Stan in for tea, randy talk, and to show off her newly-thin figure. Motor-mouthed, intrusive social workers want Stan to spend time with his teenage daughter, Tina, "fostered out" since Stan's divorce. One Sunday, Hazel invites Stan and Tina to dinner; Gordon and Hazel argue; it's on to Stan's, where June shows up wanting a private talk. She's miserable. Tina mutely looks on.
                        
    遊客,如果您要查看本帖隱藏內容請回復
    此处可设置个性签名 http://www.tiemawei.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=profile&op=info

    Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|TMW Inc.

    GMT+8, 2026-5-7 11:14

    Powered by Discuz! X3

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表