鐵馬威高清綜合論壇

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
查看: 11|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[其他] 1940[Fantasia sottomarina][BT下载/迅雷下载]

[複製鏈接]
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-7-15 17:06
  • 簽到天數: 6 天

    [LV.2]偶爾看看I

    跳轉到指定樓層
    樓主
    發表於 2016-5-22 22:43:39 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式

    馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。

    您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊

    x

                                   
    登錄/註冊後可看大圖

    【导演】:罗伯托·罗西里尼
                                【主演】:
                                【标签】: 短片
                                【制片地区/国家】:意大利
                                【年份】:1940
                                【语言】:意大利语
                                【上映时间】: 1940
                                【片长】: 11min
                                【原名】:Fantasia sottomarina
                                【又名】:
                                【评分】:豆瓣:0 ,IMDB:6.4
                                【IMDb链接】: tt0027606
                               
                               
                               
    在这部Fantasia sottomarina短片片中,Roberto Rossellini's first film is a work of deceptive transparency. In its initial moments the film appears to be a documentary about underwater, even deep-sea, species. But soon after, the
    narration, in the manner of Cocteau, unleashes a powerful "dual reality" onto the images, imbuing them not only with a narrative logic, but a kind of magic. (Let's be clear, for Rossellini there are basically
    no precedents; or about those that can at least "be said to" exist this filmmaker would always be willing in turn to rejoinder, and pointedly, that the material influences for any film of merit hail from life
    itself and the powers of the observer; correspondences between films might exist — but why shouldn't they, since audiences and filmmakers are all, ostensibly, alive.) Magic always resides within reality; maybe
    it's better to say Rossellini "imbues" less than he unlocks. So I ask, at no-one in particular: Is the difference in method (imbue vs. unlock) why Rossellini (or Vigo, or Renoir) have, insanely, been
    perpetually categorized as (excruciatingly loaded, extraordinarily wish-fulfilling and villainous phrase) "master realists," as though they were closer in form and temperament to the aggressions of a
    Chernyshevsky than to the "specific details" of a Nabokov? As though Picasso's famous assertion — "I do not seek — I find" — were, after all, too "oracular" (read as: foolish, mad, cavalier, unsuitable for We
    2.0) and, therefore, too domineering in service of the cause of the Individual (too self-involved!), rather than that of the marxist-christianic Social Fabric (just communist/grown-up enough!)? It is my belief
    that whenever imagination and freedom stand as the core precepts of one's aesthetic, no intrusions (invited or repressed) of "political" or "social" "realities," either as plot-element, backdrop, or general
    milieu, can grant Possession and Control of that work to the envious workaday critics, hack bloggers, or majordomo Ideologians. All great artists know, and from head to toe, that the big picture is the
    Individual and his interior perceptions of the outside world — and that artistic generation is simply the mimetic representation, mise en abyme, of this graceful essence and its occasionally ancillary residue
    (i.e., external action). For Rossellini, social realities exist in counterpoint to knowledge and fantasy, and Rossellini's Undersea Fantasy [Fantasia sottomarina, 1938] is an essay upon man's only material
    reality: his origin, and the circumstances of his end.
                        The tale of two fish in love, threatened by an octopus and saved by an eel.
                        
    遊客,如果您要查看本帖隱藏內容請回復
    此处可设置个性签名 http://www.tiemawei.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=profile&op=info

    Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|TMW Inc.

    GMT+8, 2025-12-26 23:24

    Powered by Discuz! X3

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表